https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976012
--- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Peter Hutterer from comment #19) > > You should consider converting any build dependencies that are located by > > Meson via pkgconfig to use pkgconfig() names instead of their package > > names. That way you'll always get them, even if they change package names. > > true, though in this case: wireplumber wants *a lot* of .pc files which are > effectively all provided by glib2-devel and gobject-introspection-devel. > Switching to pkgconfig means either only checking separately for all of > those, making the spec file harder to maintain, or just some of those > knowing that they're in the same package anyway. Both option are IMO worse > than requiring the package name directly. Only systemd and lua-devel could > meaningfully be switched to the pkgconfig check here without any drawbacks. That's an interesting argument. The way I tend to look at it is that by having the information in sync with what Meson is actually looking for, it's less likely to fail in the future if things get reorganized. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
