https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976012
--- Comment #23 from Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Peter Hutterer from comment #22) > > The devel package needs to depend on the libs package now. :) > > ♫ 99 issues with the review request ♩ > ♪ 99 things to change ♬ > ♬ fix them all, submit it again ♪ > ♩ 99 issues with the review request ♫ > It almost feels like a song could be made out of this, but I promise the wait is nearly over! :) > Done, same sources. > > > That's an interesting argument. The way I tend to look at it is that by > > having the information in sync with what Meson is actually looking for, > > it's less likely to fail in the future if things get reorganized. > > Yeah, I generally agree (I think most of my other packages now use > pkgconfig) but here it's clunky. glib has a lot of .pc files so we need to > check for 4 of those. pipewire has 2. but gobject-introspection-devel is > still the package because WP checks for a binary, not the .pc file. So it's > all a bit messy, IMO. But that's not a hill I'm willing to engage windmills > in aggressive conduct on, so I've changed it to pkgconfig now. No worries, I wasn't going to force it either. But I'm glad it's changed. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
