> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:27 , Brian Lucas <bcl1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Worked like a charm! I patched it manually rather than downloading and
> running diff on such a small change. Thank you so much for your time! The
> PF team never fails to amaze. When I run the 5.6 update is this patch going
> to break the update? Will I have to re patch? Thanks!
Hi Brian,
Yes, unfortunately you would have to reapply the patch to 5.6.
If it works well enough I’ll include it in 5.7 though.
The issue is that there are case where you may not want your graphite server to
be on the PF server.
I would like to extend the patch a little so that the URL might be pointed to
another host entirely.
There is also the fact that the is little authentication (i.e none) applied to
those requests.
We are considering actually pointing the URL to the GUI’s IP and then proxying
those requests to the actual httpd.graphite process.
Decisions, decisions.
All inputs are welcome.
Regards,
--
Louis Munro
lmu...@inverse.ca :: www.inverse.ca
+1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
