Hi Martijn,

Thanks for your reply! I'll try your suggestions and I'll follow up off-list in case I get stuck.


Regards,

Jeroen van Ingen, Network Engineer
University of Twente | Library, ICT Services & Archive (LISA)
P.O.Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Telephone +31 53 489 2526, http://www.utwente.nl/lisa;
room: http://bit.ly/2XUGPKT


On 06-07-2026 10:00, Martijn Langendoen wrote:
Hoi Jeroen,

Leuk dat je aan het testen bent. Nadat ik Qmanage vaarwel had gezegd en overstapte naar 
PF had ik nog Cisco en gebruikte ik SNMP Security. Dit kan nog steeds met PF. Uiteraard 
moet PF SNMP read/Write kunnen op de switch. Dan in je Connection Profile moet je 
filteren op Connection Type "SNMP-Traps"

In de Network Device Configuration Guide staan nog wat Cisco IOS configuratie 
tips.

Het belangrijkste is je Connectie profiel als daar maar staat SNMP-Traps als 
connection type dan zal het waarschijnlijk ook wel werken met de HP's

Met vriendelijke groet,

Martijn Langendoen
Network Administrator
[email protected]
0118654307 | 0683260904
Werkdagen: maandag t/m vrijdag Kousteensedijk 7
4331 JE Middelburg
Postbus 8004
4330 EA Middelburg
dezb.nl

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: J. van Ingen Schenau (UT-LISA) via PacketFence-users 
<[email protected]>
Verzonden: donderdag 2 juli 2026 15:23
Aan: [email protected]
CC: J. van Ingen Schenau (UT-LISA) <[email protected]>
Onderwerp: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence on LAN with port security traps

Hi,

Is anyone using PacketFence on the wired network and using port security traps, 
instead of RADIUS based methods like 802.1X and MAC Authentication Bypass?

As far as I know, PacketFence is one of the very few NAC solutions that still 
supports operation modes with Port Security and/or link state traps. We're 
considering moving from a commercial and very closed NAC solution (that 
primarily uses Port Security) to something new and we'd like to keep using the 
Port Security approach, especially for ports where eg building automation and 
security equipment is connected.

We can likely extend device support where needed, but I'm hoping that someone 
(either actively using this feature or from Akamai/Inverse) can help me get 
started to get this working on a single switch. Preferably a HP ProCurve (any 
model), but a Cisco Catalyst (9200L) would also be fine.


Regards,

Jeroen van Ingen, Network Engineer
University of Twente | Library, ICT Services & Archive (LISA) P.O.Box 217, 7500 
AE Enschede, The Netherlands Telephone +31 53 489 2526, http://www.utwente.nl/lisa;
room: http://bit.ly/2XUGPKT



_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users



_______________________________________________
PacketFence-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Reply via email to