> 2. A very little notice: > Now 1.5b < 1.5, but 1.5.b > 1.5 > In the "block terminology" of the code, 1.5b and 1.5.b are identical. > The difference appeared, because your patch uses isalpha() instead of > some "next block is alpha?" computation. To be honest, this may be > better than 1.5.b < 1.5, so you can skip this casuist note. > > Bye
This note inspired me to test '1.0. == 1.0' You may think that this is useless, but image '1.0 ' versus '1.0' (extra spacebar, '\n' etc. character). The old code beats the new one again :-P Bye _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev