On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apparently the static strings were a show stopper to Dan. > I don't have a problem with static strings, since it removes the > malloc/free overhead and also simplifies the code. > As always with dynamic strings, we have the choice between duplicating > all free calls, or using goto. > > But anyway, here is a new patch using strdup/free instead of static arrays. >
This breaks sync1000, sync1003 and upgrade075 pactest, but I have not yet been able to figure out why. _______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
