At 1/6/2000 09:12 AM (Thursday), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >However, they should add a reason why they need to work outside the normal >rules or make a statement that they understand they are breaking the rules >but >wish not to explain why. That is if they do not want to get a large >number of >posted replies that say simply we suggest you don't do this. On the other hand the responders could have a bit more tact and refrain from questioning someone's motives so readily. I recommend asking the originator first if they wouldn't mind pursuing a discussion of their rationale. I hope we have the type of community where one does not have to be concerned that he phrases everything "just right" in order to get a productive answer the first time. Let's go easy on each other, folks!
- Ending an application Ralph Krausse
- Re: Ending an application Brian Mathis
- RE: Ending an application Arun Eachambadi
- Re: Ending an application Paul Nevai
- RE: Ending an application Richard Hartman
- Re: Ending an application Roger Chaplin
- Re: Ending an application Charles Rezsonya
- Re: Ending an application Charles Rezsonya
- RE: Ending an application Ralph Krausse
- Re: Ending an application ron
- RE: Ending an application Doug Chamberlin
- RE: Ending an application Ralph Krausse
- Re: Ending an application Holger Klawitter
- Re: Ending an application Brian Mathis
- Re: Ending an application Charles Rezsonya
- RE: Ending an application Richard Hartman
- RE: Ending an application Richard Hartman
- RE: Ending an application Jim Schram
- RE: Ending an application Ralph Krausse
- RE: Ending an application Ralph Krausse
- Re: Ending an application Charles Rezsonya
