I think so, i've been working with Easy sync years ago, but it always had
problems on the integration process, it's better to use intellisync or
Pylon.
Please advise on your progress
Regards
Jorge Herrera.
Brian Mathis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@news.palmos.com on 08/06/2000
04:27:07 PM
Please respond to "Palm Developer Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Palm Developer Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Fax to:
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes Email Conduit Help
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Elizabeth,
>
> We are in the process of tackling this issue right now. I think the best
> approach to use is stick with EasySync for Notes mail and the basic Palm
> applications, then create a custom conduit useing the Notes C++ API.
I've used
> the Notes C++ API, just never from a conduit, and I know that EasySync
works
> well for everything else.
>
> How hard could it be?
>
> I'll let you know how things progress from my end.
>
> - Ed
I would recommend against EasySync. Lotus provides absolutely dismal
support, and it never works quite right. After having many problems with
EasySync, I found that Intellisync from Puma works wonderfully. I even
use it to replace the basic conduits. It provides sync abilities between
many types of organizer software as well. http://www.pumatech.com
You can do anything you want with it, filtering, exporting to CSV files,
importing, ... I really can't say enough good things about it, and
conversely, enough bad things about Lotus EasySync.
--
Brian Mathis
Direct Edge
http://www.directedge.com
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe,
please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
