Bernard Aboba wrote:
Thank you, this is rather significant. In fact, perhaps it should be a part of
an update to RFC3748.
I am not seeing a clamour for an update to RFC 3748, frankly. Or do I
sense a hidden agenda?
No hidden agenda. Just that RFC3748 makes some statements about what EAP
needs in terms of its transport, and since we see EAP over UDP/IP,
IKE/TCP, Ethernet, PPP, etc... those statements should be as accurate
as possible lest people needlessly over-design their protocols. We may
find that PANA is a case in point.
- Mark
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
