On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:00:34AM -0800, Bernard Aboba wrote: > > No hidden agenda. Just that RFC3748 makes some statements about what EAP > > needs > > in terms of its transport, and since we see EAP over UDP/IP, IKE/TCP, > > Ethernet, PPP, etc... those statements should be as accurate as possible > > lest > > people needlessly over-design their protocols. We may find that PANA is a > > case > > in point. > > Based on the discussion, if PANA were to implement a transport providing > for duplicate detection within a window, then this would also provide an > ordering guarantee for EAP packets, since EAP is an ACK/NAK protocol. >
But lower layer still needs to be a ACK/NAK protocol like RADIUS, right? Yoshihiro Ohba _______________________________________________ Pana mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
