On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:37:15PM -0800, Glen Zorn (gwz) wrote: > > I believe that the packet flow which I gave in an earlier message > illustrated that a timer-based algorithm is insufficient for duplicate > detection in both RADIUS and EAP if the identifier is allowed to simply > "change" between exchanges. In fact, I think that timers are > unnecessary: all that is needed to solve the problem is to specify the > semantics of the Identifier to be those of a sequence number with > roll-over. >
I agree, and that is what PANA is doing with sequence number. Yoshihiro Ohba _______________________________________________ Pana mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
