In the spirit of analyzing the DSLF's Subscriber Authentication Requirements
as presented through a liaison letter on May 25, 2007, we discussed the
following material during IETF 70 PANA WG meeting.
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/pana-3.ppt
We have reached consensus among the PANA WG members present in the room. In
order to make this an official WG consensus, we are running this by the WG
via mailing list.
If you have any feedback, please send an e-mail on the mailing list by
December 11, 2007 Tuesday 6pm PT.
If there is no objection, IETF PANA WG will send a liaison letter to DSLF
based on this consensus.
- IETF PANA WG Chairs
I strongly disagree. PANA is not suitable to DSLForum requirements.
Other protocols in the IETF and IEEE are far better candidates. Taking
this work in the PANA WG is a totally wrong conclusion that somehow PANA
is the correct framework for solving a layer 2 authentication problem!
Put you hammer back in the drawer, not every problem is a nail you need
to hit with it.
- Ric
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
