Alper,
I could not attend IETF meeting at Vancouver this time. However,
I went over the PANA analysis slides that you sent covering DSLF
Subscriber Auth Requirement.
I agree that it would be a good idea to start the process of
communicating with DSLF forum by providing them with this analysis and
seek if they have any more requirement that needs to be looked at.
Regards
Ashutosh
Alper Yegin wrote:
In the spirit of analyzing the DSLF's Subscriber Authentication Requirements
as presented through a liaison letter on May 25, 2007, we discussed the
following material during IETF 70 PANA WG meeting.
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/pana-3.ppt
We have reached consensus among the PANA WG members present in the room. In
order to make this an official WG consensus, we are running this by the WG
via mailing list.
If you have any feedback, please send an e-mail on the mailing list by
December 11, 2007 Tuesday 6pm PT.
If there is no objection, IETF PANA WG will send a liaison letter to DSLF
based on this consensus.
- IETF PANA WG Chairs
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
