I support sending the material to the DSLF. Since the PANA WG has been working for more than 6 years on the specific problem space where the DSLF is seeking a solution, and there is no other IETF WG that has been working on the problem space, I don't see any problem with sending technical input from the PANA WG to the DSLF on this matter. I would rather think it's very strange and unfair if this attempt were to be blocked.
Yoshihiro Ohba On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:38:50AM +0200, Alper Yegin wrote: > > > In the spirit of analyzing the DSLF's Subscriber Authentication Requirements > as presented through a liaison letter on May 25, 2007, we discussed the > following material during IETF 70 PANA WG meeting. > > http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/slides/pana-3.ppt > > We have reached consensus among the PANA WG members present in the room. In > order to make this an official WG consensus, we are running this by the WG > via mailing list. > > If you have any feedback, please send an e-mail on the mailing list by > December 11, 2007 Tuesday 6pm PT. > > If there is no objection, IETF PANA WG will send a liaison letter to DSLF > based on this consensus. > > - IETF PANA WG Chairs > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pana mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana > _______________________________________________ Pana mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
