Not good news. Because I want to use it in a Tk environment and Tk has problems with threads, I want to have real processes. And fork is unfortunately not creating a real process in a win32 environment.
Would be great if you could tell a bit more about the special purpose perl interpreter. Is it planned to implement the support of multiple perl interpreters in the future? Thank you. Cheers, Dirk Roderich Schupp <[email protected]> schrieb: >On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 20:32, Dirk Joos <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there a way to pack this script consisting of two perl scripts >into a >> standalone executable without needing to have perl installed. > >TL;DR: No. > >If you need a second Perl interpreter, try using fork or threads. > >Technically, the cache area (after unpacking) contains a special >purpose >Perl interpreter, but it's not meant to be invoked explicitly. > >Cheers, Roderich -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
