Sounds good to me. Or always mangle VisIt classes for PointSprite, until we have time to fix the PointSprite plugin cleanly.
Utkarsh On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Robert Maynard <robert.mayn...@kitware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think we can fix this by modifying the PointSprite plugin to check to see > if the VisIt Bridge is enabled and to conditional building the conflicting > classes only when the Bridge is disabled or we can name mangle the VisIt > classes that the PointSprite plugin is building. > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Burlen Loring <blor...@lbl.gov> wrote: >> >> Sorry, misread your reply, sounds like you would prefer to keep >> visit-bridge on. But will you disabled point-sprite in the binary release? I >> noticed that when the client has it but server does not it causes a crash. >> >> >> On 03/05/2012 11:11 AM, Burlen Loring wrote: >>> >>> So are you disabling VisIt bridge in the binary release? If not would it >>> still lead to a crash if the binary has VB on, and the server has VB off? >>> >>> On 03/05/2012 11:21 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, I believe we ran into that as well. Short of re-factoring the >>>> PointSpritePlugin, the work around for now is to disable the >>>> point-sprite plugin when using visit-bridge and static builds. >>>> >>>> Utkarsh >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Burlen Loring<blor...@lbl.gov> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Utkarsh, >>>>> >>>>> By the way, not a huge issue but I also had a problem with static >>>>> builds >>>>> when trying to enable the visit bridge. The visit bridge and the Point >>>>> Sprite Pluign both had copies of some of the same code. >>>>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12972 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Burlen >>>>> >>>>> On 03/05/2012 10:12 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Burlen, >>>>>> >>>>>> To give you an update, we have decided to put out a patch release >>>>>> within the next week or so that should include the fix for this bug. >>>>>> >>>>>> Utkarsh >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Burlen Loring<blor...@lbl.gov> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That seems to have fixed the problem, thanks Utkarsh! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 02/29/2012 03:43 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Burlen, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Attached is a patch. Can you please verify if that solves the issue? >>>>>>>> Seems to working now in my tests. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> Utkarsh >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit >>>>>>>> <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Burlen, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I haven't tried reproducing the problem, but looking at the code, >>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>> pretty obvious why it could fail. I'll work on a fix soon. I think >>>>>>>>> this and few other state file backwards compatibility related >>>>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>>> that been reported may warrant a quick patch release. But I'll >>>>>>>>> check >>>>>>>>> with the team once I get back next week and give everyone an >>>>>>>>> update. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Utkarsh >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Burlen Loring<blor...@lbl.gov> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Rick, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yes things are fine in 3.12 it's only with 3.14 that I'm having >>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> issue. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Burlen >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 02/29/2012 10:52 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Burlen - I've been testing with 3.12, not 3.14 ... did things >>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> in 3.12 and they are now broken in 3.14? >>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Rick Angelini >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory >>>>>>>>>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch >>>>>>>>>>> HPC Architectures Development Team >>>>>>>>>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center) Data Analysis& >>>>>>>>>>> Assessment >>>>>>>>>>> Center >>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 410-278-6266 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> From: Burlen Loring [blor...@lbl.gov] >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:29 PM >>>>>>>>>>> To: Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) >>>>>>>>>>> Cc: paraview@paraview.org >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Rick, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Good, maybe it's something specific to my configuration although >>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>> have any idea what it could be off hand. Just to be sure: do you >>>>>>>>>>> mean >>>>>>>>>>> that you haven't had noticed problems or that you've positively >>>>>>>>>>> verified >>>>>>>>>>> that after using the enum once you could change the value? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>>>> Burlen >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 02/29/2012 10:31 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What platform is the client running on? We make extensive use >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> pvsc >>>>>>>>>>>> and enumerations and have not seen this (mis)behavior on our >>>>>>>>>>>> Mac/Linux >>>>>>>>>>>> client workstations...... >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Rick Angelini >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory >>>>>>>>>>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch >>>>>>>>>>>> HPC Architectures Development Team >>>>>>>>>>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center) Data Analysis& >>>>>>>>>>>> Assessment >>>>>>>>>>>> Center >>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 410-278-6266 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org >>>>>>>>>>>> [paraview-boun...@paraview.org] >>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>> behalf of Burlen Loring [blor...@lbl.gov] >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:58 PM >>>>>>>>>>>> To: paraview@paraview.org >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've encountered bugs with pvsc enumerations in version 3.14.0. >>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> the attached pvsc that makes use of a couple of enumerations. >>>>>>>>>>>> After >>>>>>>>>>>> connecting once w/ this pvsc, neither of the enums save the >>>>>>>>>>>> user's >>>>>>>>>>>> choice in the GUI the next time the server is used. However they >>>>>>>>>>>> seem >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> remember the user's last choice internally and always uses that >>>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>>>>>>>>>> of what the user has selected in the GUI. Neither setting >>>>>>>>>>>> save=false >>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>> removing the default attribute helps. I filed the bug report >>>>>>>>>>>> here. >>>>>>>>>>>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12969 If it's confirmed >>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> bug be fixed in another 3.14 release? or should I simply remove >>>>>>>>>>>> enumerations from our pvsc's for 3.14? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Burlen >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>>>>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>>>>>>>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Powered by www.kitware.com >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > > > -- > Robert Maynard _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
