Rick, The 3.14.1 prebuilt binaries will work just fine with 3.14.0 servers, so you can just use the 3.14.1 prebuilt binaries without having to update your servers to 3.14.1.
Utkarsh On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) <richard.c.angelini....@mail.mil> wrote: > Is there any way this patch was rolled back into the 3.14.0 pre-built > binaries? We're pushing 3.14.0 as our current default and I'm now getting > bit by this enumeration bug. I'm not really interested in pushing 3.14.1 > if I can help it. 8-) > > The bug that I'm hitting is that I have enumeration strings and regardless of > which string I pick, I'm getting the default value as the setting ..... > > ________________________________ > Rick Angelini > > USArmy Research Laboratory > Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch > HPC Architectures Development Team > ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center) Data Analysis & Assessment Center > Phone: 410-278-6266 > > ________________________________________ > From: Utkarsh Ayachit [utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 6:43 PM > To: Burlen Loring > Cc: Angelini, Richard C CIV (US); paraview@paraview.org > Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues > > Burlen, > > Attached is a patch. Can you please verify if that solves the issue? > Seems to working now in my tests. > > Thanks > Utkarsh > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit > <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: >> Burlen, >> >> I haven't tried reproducing the problem, but looking at the code, it's >> pretty obvious why it could fail. I'll work on a fix soon. I think >> this and few other state file backwards compatibility related issues >> that been reported may warrant a quick patch release. But I'll check >> with the team once I get back next week and give everyone an update. >> >> Utkarsh >> >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Burlen Loring <blor...@lbl.gov> wrote: >>> Hi Rick, >>> >>> yes things are fine in 3.12 it's only with 3.14 that I'm having this issue. >>> >>> Burlen >>> >>> >>> On 02/29/2012 10:52 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote: >>>> >>>> Burlen - I've been testing with 3.12, not 3.14 ... did things work for you >>>> in 3.12 and they are now broken in 3.14? >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Rick Angelini >>>> >>>> USArmy Research Laboratory >>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch >>>> HPC Architectures Development Team >>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center) Data Analysis& Assessment Center >>>> Phone: 410-278-6266 >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: Burlen Loring [blor...@lbl.gov] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:29 PM >>>> To: Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) >>>> Cc: paraview@paraview.org >>>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues >>>> >>>> Hi Rick, >>>> >>>> Good, maybe it's something specific to my configuration although I don't >>>> have any idea what it could be off hand. Just to be sure: do you mean >>>> that you haven't had noticed problems or that you've positively verified >>>> that after using the enum once you could change the value? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> Burlen >>>> >>>> On 02/29/2012 10:31 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What platform is the client running on? We make extensive use of pvsc >>>>> and enumerations and have not seen this (mis)behavior on our Mac/Linux >>>>> client workstations...... >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> Rick Angelini >>>>> >>>>> USArmy Research Laboratory >>>>> Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch >>>>> HPC Architectures Development Team >>>>> ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center) Data Analysis& Assessment >>>>> Center >>>>> Phone: 410-278-6266 >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org [paraview-boun...@paraview.org] on >>>>> behalf of Burlen Loring [blor...@lbl.gov] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:58 PM >>>>> To: paraview@paraview.org >>>>> Subject: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I've encountered bugs with pvsc enumerations in version 3.14.0. I have >>>>> the attached pvsc that makes use of a couple of enumerations. After >>>>> connecting once w/ this pvsc, neither of the enums save the user's >>>>> choice in the GUI the next time the server is used. However they seem to >>>>> remember the user's last choice internally and always uses that instead >>>>> of what the user has selected in the GUI. Neither setting save=false or >>>>> removing the default attribute helps. I filed the bug report here. >>>>> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12969 If it's confirmed would the >>>>> bug be fixed in another 3.14 release? or should I simply remove >>>>> enumerations from our pvsc's for 3.14? >>>>> >>>>> Burlen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>> >>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
