Great! Thanks John. Utkarsh
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Biddiscombe, John A. <biddi...@cscs.ch> wrote: > Thanks. These ones will be easy to fix. I’ll have a crack at refactoring the > PSplugin as soon as possible. > > > > JB > > > > From: Burlen Loring [mailto:blor...@lbl.gov] > Sent: 05 March 2012 20:31 > To: Biddiscombe, John A. > Cc: Robert Maynard; paraview@paraview.org > > > Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues > > > > http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12972 > > On 03/05/2012 11:40 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. wrote: > > which stuff in the point sprite is causing trouble? I wanted to redo some of > it because now that I know more of the internals of the pqXXX classes, there > is some stuff that is a little obsolete in the PSPlugin. > > > > JB > > > > From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] > On Behalf Of Robert Maynard > Sent: 05 March 2012 20:36 > To: Burlen Loring > Cc: paraview@paraview.org > Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues > > > > Hi, > > > > I think we can fix this by modifying the PointSprite plugin to check to see > if the VisIt Bridge is enabled and to conditional building the conflicting > classes only when the Bridge is disabled or we can name mangle the VisIt > classes that the PointSprite plugin is building. > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Burlen Loring <blor...@lbl.gov> wrote: > > Sorry, misread your reply, sounds like you would prefer to keep visit-bridge > on. But will you disabled point-sprite in the binary release? I noticed that > when the client has it but server does not it causes a crash. > > > > On 03/05/2012 11:11 AM, Burlen Loring wrote: > > So are you disabling VisIt bridge in the binary release? If not would it > still lead to a crash if the binary has VB on, and the server has VB off? > > On 03/05/2012 11:21 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: > > Yes, I believe we ran into that as well. Short of re-factoring the > PointSpritePlugin, the work around for now is to disable the > point-sprite plugin when using visit-bridge and static builds. > > Utkarsh > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Burlen Loring<blor...@lbl.gov> wrote: > > Utkarsh, > > By the way, not a huge issue but I also had a problem with static builds > when trying to enable the visit bridge. The visit bridge and the Point > Sprite Pluign both had copies of some of the same code. > http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12972 > > > Burlen > > On 03/05/2012 10:12 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: > > Burlen, > > To give you an update, we have decided to put out a patch release > within the next week or so that should include the fix for this bug. > > Utkarsh > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Burlen Loring<blor...@lbl.gov> wrote: > > That seems to have fixed the problem, thanks Utkarsh! > > > On 02/29/2012 03:43 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: > > Burlen, > > Attached is a patch. Can you please verify if that solves the issue? > Seems to working now in my tests. > > Thanks > Utkarsh > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit > <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: > > Burlen, > > I haven't tried reproducing the problem, but looking at the code, it's > pretty obvious why it could fail. I'll work on a fix soon. I think > this and few other state file backwards compatibility related issues > that been reported may warrant a quick patch release. But I'll check > with the team once I get back next week and give everyone an update. > > Utkarsh > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Burlen Loring<blor...@lbl.gov> > wrote: > > Hi Rick, > > yes things are fine in 3.12 it's only with 3.14 that I'm having this > issue. > > Burlen > > > On 02/29/2012 10:52 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote: > > Burlen - I've been testing with 3.12, not 3.14 ... did things work > for > you > in 3.12 and they are now broken in 3.14? > ________________________________ > Rick Angelini > > USArmy Research Laboratory > Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch > HPC Architectures Development Team > ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center) Data Analysis& Assessment > Center > Phone: 410-278-6266 > > ________________________________________ > From: Burlen Loring [blor...@lbl.gov] > Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:29 PM > To: Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) > Cc: paraview@paraview.org > Subject: Re: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues > > Hi Rick, > > Good, maybe it's something specific to my configuration although I > don't > have any idea what it could be off hand. Just to be sure: do you mean > that you haven't had noticed problems or that you've positively > verified > that after using the enum once you could change the value? > > thanks > Burlen > > On 02/29/2012 10:31 AM, Angelini, Richard C CIV (US) wrote: > > What platform is the client running on? We make extensive use of > pvsc > and enumerations and have not seen this (mis)behavior on our > Mac/Linux > client workstations...... > ________________________________ > Rick Angelini > > USArmy Research Laboratory > Computational Sciences Division/Computing Architectures Branch > HPC Architectures Development Team > ARL/DSRC (DoD Shared Resource Center) Data Analysis& > Assessment > Center > Phone: 410-278-6266 > > ________________________________________ > From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org [paraview-boun...@paraview.org] > on > behalf of Burlen Loring [blor...@lbl.gov] > Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:58 PM > To: paraview@paraview.org > Subject: [Paraview] 3.14 pvsc enumeration issues > > Hi, > > I've encountered bugs with pvsc enumerations in version 3.14.0. I > have > the attached pvsc that makes use of a couple of enumerations. After > connecting once w/ this pvsc, neither of the enums save the user's > choice in the GUI the next time the server is used. However they > seem > to > remember the user's last choice internally and always uses that > instead > of what the user has selected in the GUI. Neither setting save=false > or > removing the default attribute helps. I filed the bug report here. > http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12969 If it's confirmed would > the > bug be fixed in another 3.14 release? or should I simply remove > enumerations from our pvsc's for 3.14? > > Burlen > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > > > > -- > Robert Maynard > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview