I suggest we keep our documents agnostic on exact specifications for this kind of terminology. The Rapid deployed network for emergency scenario says "free or freed spectrum". We can do a lot more with the protocol than just TVWS, or TVWS in country xx.
Teco Op 27 jan. 2012, om 09:18 heeft <[email protected]> <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > Dear Nancy, > > My understanding is that ‘unlicensed’ is used in North America and > ‘licence-exempt’ in the UK. They do refer to the same thing, I think, so one > could say (licensed, unlicensed/licence-exempt). > > Kind regards, > Jussi > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext > Nancy Bravin > Sent: 27 January 2012 06:08 > To: Probasco Scott (Nokia-CIC/Dallas) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [paws] re proposed edits on rev 2 > > Dear Scott, Raj, and all, > > Abstract > > Portions of the radio spectrum that are allocated to a licensed, > primary user but are unused or unoccupied at specific locations and > times are defined as "white space". The concept of allowing > secondary transmissions (licensed or unlicensed) in white space is a > technique to "unlock" existing spectrum for new use. > I would change (licensed or unlicensed) to: (licensed, licensed exempt or > unlicensed) as some countries have 3 categories. > Also, license exempt is mentioned in section 4.4 > > > SIncerely, Nancy > _______________________________________________ > paws mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws _______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
