All,
I believe the open issues for which there is support for change are:
1. Remove TBDs, except for the mailing-list name for PAWS IANA reviews
- Ruleset name for ETSI draft, e.g., "ETSI-EN-301-598-1.0.0-draft"
- Hyperlink to the ETSI draft
2. vCard
- Move regulatory requirements to the Ruleset sections, such as which
fields
are required.
- "fn" should be "formatted name", not "full name"
- Add an example for representing an organization
3. Shortened names
- If accepted, would shorten just the names of the fields in the
inner-most loop of the
spectrum response:
freqHz -> hz
powerDbmPerBw -> dbm
It does not seem that other fields appear often enough to have
significant impact
Should I go ahead and make these changes and try last-call again?
--
-vince
_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
