Happy New Year to all. I'd like to ask for comments again for the open issues on Draft 07. Thanks.
-vince On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Vincent Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > I believe the open issues for which there is support for change are: > > 1. Remove TBDs, except for the mailing-list name for PAWS IANA reviews > > - Ruleset name for ETSI draft, e.g., "ETSI-EN-301-598-1.0.0-draft" > - Hyperlink to the ETSI draft > > 2. vCard > - Move regulatory requirements to the Ruleset sections, such as which > fields > are required. > - "fn" should be "formatted name", not "full name" > - Add an example for representing an organization > > 3. Shortened names > - If accepted, would shorten just the names of the fields in the > inner-most loop of the > spectrum response: > > freqHz -> hz > powerDbmPerBw -> dbm > > It does not seem that other fields appear often enough to have > significant impact > > Should I go ahead and make these changes and try last-call again? > > -- > -vince > -- -vince
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
