I would have hoped to have some more discussion on some of the topics, like the shortening the names. If we do not get any more comments in the next 5-6 days, then Vince please go ahead and implement these changes and upload a new version of the document. Gabor
From: paws [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Vincent Chen Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 2:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [paws] Summary: Comments on draft-07 All, I believe the open issues for which there is support for change are: 1. Remove TBDs, except for the mailing-list name for PAWS IANA reviews - Ruleset name for ETSI draft, e.g., "ETSI-EN-301-598-1.0.0-draft" - Hyperlink to the ETSI draft 2. vCard - Move regulatory requirements to the Ruleset sections, such as which fields are required. - "fn" should be "formatted name", not "full name" - Add an example for representing an organization 3. Shortened names - If accepted, would shorten just the names of the fields in the inner-most loop of the spectrum response: freqHz -> hz powerDbmPerBw -> dbm It does not seem that other fields appear often enough to have significant impact Should I go ahead and make these changes and try last-call again? -- -vince
_______________________________________________ paws mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws
