On 8/21/14, 4:32 PM, "Gabor Bajko" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Alissa Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14: Discuss
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> I'm glad this work is being done in the IETF, thanks for all your
>> effort.
>> 
>> A couple of my points below have overlaps with some of Stephen's points.
>> 
>> = Shepherd write-up =
>> "Yes, there were 2 IPR disclosures filed that reference this document.
>> They were discussed in the WG, and nobody came forward to say that they'd
>> like to change anything in the document because of the disclosures."
>> 
>> But there are 3 IPR disclosures in the tracker, not 2. Were all three
>> discussed in the WG?
>> 
> This  3rd IPR disclosure seems to have surfaced 2 months after the shepherd
> write-up, that is why it is not mentioned in the write-up.
> I think the best we can do now is to consult the WG about this disclosure in
> parallel with the iesg evaluations.

I saw Pete’s note to the mailing list about the third IPR disclosure but
haven’t seen any responses (right?). What is the status?

Thanks,
Alissa

> Gabor


_______________________________________________
paws mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/paws

Reply via email to