With CDex, I have Lame vbr. It sounds like vbr is a good thing for MP3's, as like was mentioned, the quality of recordings can vary. I'm wondering what is the best setting for vbr? I have it set to 9, as that is the maximum. Is that the best setting for vbr (variable bit rate)?
----- Original Message ----- From: "doc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: mp3 or wav



Can I get more information on "LAME VBR"?
Doc Wright
http://wrightplaceinc.net
*Wouldn't it be nice if whenever we messed
up our life we could
simply press,'Ctrl Alt Delete' and
start all over? AMEN, AMEN !!

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: mp3 or wav




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

If you're really worried about quality and you're not particularly
concerned about disc space (perhaps you'd rather copy to DVD'S for your
record collection rather than CD'S) then you may consider a lossless
compression format such as FLAC.  A tipical 600 meg wave file will be
compressed to 300 or 400 meg without any loss in quality, you can then
decode the Flac file back to a wave file if you wish (again! with no loss
in quality), this cannot be said for MP3, the more you convert or decode
and re-encode your MP3 files then the more noticable the quality loss will
be.

A plug-in for Winamp is available to allow it to play Flac files.

Many rippers will handle Flac files including Exact Audio Copy, Easy CD DA
Extractor etc.  Nero will also handle Flac files, EAC cue sheets etc.

Allot of the portable players around (particularly those which allow
firmware upgrading and direct programming through LINUX support the FLAC
format.

So (I guess my point is in summarising (if you can) leave MP3, OGG etc
behind.

If you're going to use MP3 then try the new LAME VBR settings, takes a
while to compress but the results are outstanding! as far as MP3 goes,
you'll get small files with great sound as LAME encodes each frame of each
track according to the best bit-rate available for that frame rather than
doing all the track at a set bit rate.

At 11:31 AM 27/08/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Hello all,
I am copying my vinyl records to be put on a CD. Understanding that the
quality of the record means much, the following question still pertains to
quality.
Which format has the better recording quality..mp3 or wav?
If I recorded in .wav and then converted that .wav file to .mp3 would the
quality change?
I guess what I am asking, which format sounds better in the finished
product?
Thanks,
Morey




_______________________________________________ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 Comment: Dane Trethowan, a client of TFT-BBS run by Gordon Smith

iQA/AwUBQS9kQSlBPqY64aUBEQKPVACeOBFlfDdmco3ZtK39W2eM2uvkZbsAn0BN
Yky0jhzDWZB6wln+Y54d8NId
=rxnK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_______________________________________________
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to