I've heard people speaking of flac but since my portable player will not play it I can't see going through the hastle of conversion just to upload to my ipod.
****************************** My drinking team has a bowling problem. robert Doc Wright http://www.wrightplaceinc.net msn [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Matzura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 8:39 PM Subject: Re: The advantages of flak? On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:37:10 -0800, you wrote: >I've been able to hear comparisons of mp3 and wma formats but not flak. Are >there advantages of flak over either or both of these other than some people >believe it sounds better? thanks The L in FLAC stands for lossless. Theoretically, what goes in, comes out--that is, it's supposed to sound identical to the wave file that sourced the FLAC archive file. You are also supposed to be able to decode a FLAC file and get the original wave file back. I've never tried this but would be keen to know if it's actually true, bit for bit. Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.4/1146 - Release Date: 11/22/2007 6:55 PM Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
