For audio books on CD I obtain from the public library and rip to
listen on my MP3 player, I use a 44.100 sampling rate and 96k bitrate.
 I have found that I lose some of the emotion and distinctness of the
reader at 64k.  At that lower bitrate, the recording sounds flat.
Broadcast radio standards do call for 128k bit rates.  For personal
listening of voice recordings, 96k is a good compromise for me between
broadcast quality and the 64k used in many online archives.  I’m
especially keen to the trade offs as I am still using an original
Bookport with a 512 megabyte card.


Kelly




On 4/25/10, Richard Claypool <bellevue....@gmail.com> wrote:
> One thing I'll add to this.  if it's speach, go 64k mono, not stereo.  when
> you take a file, and make it stereo, you have to put twice as much data into
> the same size file, guess what gets crunched?  that's right, quality.  for a
> drastic sample of this effect, ri9p a file at 24k mono, and then at 24k
> stereo.
>
> Pet pieve, people who rip books at 64k stereo.  Plus, not all encoders are
> equil.
>
> Ave Rickamus
> twitter
> http://twitter.com/elheme
> msn
> bellevue....@gmail.com
> skype
> lord_of_beer
> last fm
> http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Judy W" <ju...@austin.rr.com>
> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:28 PM
> Subject: RE: bit rate and sample rate
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> for speech I would suggest 44.1 and 64 kbps. If it is a performance, sound
>> seeing tour, or historical event I would consider either 96 or 128 for
>> speech only. This does not apply to the earlier posts on music and cd
>> quality.
>>
>> Judy
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
>> On Behalf Of Richard Claypool
>> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:12 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have no idea where you pulled this info, but a cd is not 128kbps.
>> that's
>> the min you'd want to use, but I'd suggest 192kbps.  If you want lossless
>> i.e. cd sounding recordings, use flac.
>> Ave Rickamus
>> twitter
>> http://twitter.com/elheme
>> msn
>> bellevue....@gmail.com
>> skype
>> lord_of_beer
>> last fm
>> http://www.last.fm/user/lord_of_beer
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "brandon armstrong" <stunners...@gmail.com>
>> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 4:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: bit rate and sample rate
>>
>>
>>> if you want to make decent recordings, your sample rate should be 44.1
>>> for
>>
>>> cd quality and your bit rate or the rate that data is processed per
>>> second
>>
>>> should be at 128 kbps or killabites per second.
>>> that's the quality of most cd recordings.
>>> Brandon
>>> On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Joe wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's an interesting question. I've experimented with a lot of
>>>> different
>>
>>>> bit rates and sample rates doing voice recordings but still don't know
>>>> what combination of the two give good enough quality for speech. I know
>>>> you need higher rates for music, at least 128KBPS. I'm only talking
>>>> about
>>
>>>> voice recordings using a mic at this point. What combination of bit and
>>>> sample rate will take the least space and give me fair quality speech
>>>> audio. What should be higher. The bit rate, or the sample rate. I'm
>>>> talking about MP 3 files. I'd like to get a better understanding of
>>>> this.
>>
>>>> Thanks in advance. Joe.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>>> signature database 3832 (20090206) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>> signature
>> database 3832 (20090206) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
>> signature database 3832 (20090206) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
> database 3832 (20090206) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

Reply via email to