Yes, that quality is great. I also record that on total recorder and others. Also good to mention that if you con't afford the zoom or ls100 or the sound devices, you might also try the ls14 as it also record up to 96-24 bit. I don't mind the overdub and multi track stuff to be equal to cd quality, as you mostly either burn it on cd afterwords, or just use the wave file to convert from there and/or use the project in the original format.
On 01/05/2013, Hamit Campos <hamitcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, it is. Plus, you have heard what it sounds like already to a cirtain > extent. When ever Neal uses his 744-T on pod casts, that's what this thing > sounds like. It's also what the USB Pre2 audio interface sounds like. So he > didn't know what format the projects were saved in then? That's too bad. I > thought he would. Oh well. By the way, I think the overdub stuff only works > at CD quality. In other words, it only works at LPCM 44 thousand 100 KHZ 16 > Bit. If I remember correctly anyways. I'd mostly be recording in Blu-ray > quality on it though. Yes, PCM 96 KHZ 24 Bit is Blu-Ray HD audio quality. > So > there it is. > -----Original Message----- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Aidan > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 6:23 AM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: motherboard with good onboard audio > > Well, its not so difficult, as most of the multi track features can be > figured out when playback and you can also assign the mute and solo to the > f1 and f2 keys. I did ask neil but he couldn't tel me. That other recorder > sounds great. > > On 01 May 2013, at 2:21, "Hamit Campos" <hamitcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ah yeah. I don't know about that. Perhaps Neal might. But here's the other > thing though. As far as I know, all the multitrack stuff isn't too > accessible. I know someone on this here list did it once, but it doesn't > talk. So, if you can deal with that like Neal can, and like that person > can, > then yeah maybe. I want one for the quality. I don't think I'd use the > multitrack thing that much though. On something like the Sound Devices > 788-T > I might though. That thing has 8 XLR plugs. So you can use 8 mikes. Import > those into Pro Tools, and you can create 7.1 surround files. Yeah, I'm into > 7.1 surround sound. I love surround sound. But yeah. The problem with all > the Sound Devices stuff though is it doesn't talk. I can't deal with it > like > Neal can. I'd get lost. I'd have to have some one set it up for me and then > just forget about it. But yeah, back to the LS-100. I like it well enough, > and I do want one, but it's just for the sound quality, and full LPCM 96 > KHZ > 24 bit. The sound devices goes the next step up in sample rate though, they > do 192 thousand KHZ. That's way cool. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Aidan > Maher > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 5:59 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: motherboard with good onboard audio > > Yes, I got the focusrite scarlett 2i4 card, and that also dubbles as a midi > interface, very good and really outstanding. I am considering the > ls100 as I get to much latency at the moment and I couldn't solve that yet, > but I have a problem, I am scaired that once I bounce tracks on that > recorder that I won't be able to export everything in one file, because > after you have done 8 tracks you must bounce them in order to make new > space > available and to emty the tracks. And the other thing is I am not sure if > you would be able to open that project in audacity or sonar, I mean I don't > no wich format the ls100 save its projects. I also don't no if you can > overdub on one track a few times. > > On 30/04/2013, Hamit Campos <hamitcam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, external maybe better. Even PCIE like the Sound Blaster ones >> would do perhaps. Now if like me you want to really go high end, then >> a pro sound card or in fancy turms an Audio Interface would be best. I >> so want the Sound Devices USB Pre2. Thing is, it's $600. But if you've >> heard the few recordings Neal Ewers has made on BCT on his Sound >> Devices 744-T recorder, then you know it's well worth it. I just don't >> have the $600 at hand. By the way, even something like an LS-100 or a >> Zoom H4-N would be good to. Pluss, theres are stand alone recordes too >> so you aren't always strapped to the PC if you don't want to be. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Joe >> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 3:39 PM >> To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org >> Subject: motherboard with good onboard audio >> >> Hi. The subject asks the question. Is it possible to get a computer >> with good onboard audio? The last PC I built in 2008 has an Intel >> DG41RQ MOTHERBOARD THAT BOASTS OF HIGH DEFINITION audio but its far >> from > that. >> Even >> at 100 percent I can't get a good level. I've tried several >> microphones so I don't think the mic is the problem. Are they're any >> computers out there either pree built or home built that have good >> level audio? or is it always better to just get an external sound card >> and forget about on board audio. >> Thanks. Joe. >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
