Yes you have a point, that is why I don't really like the youtube stuff so much. But I like it that that model at least have a dedicated line in jack, instead of a shaired one.
On 02/05/2013, Hamit Campos <hamitcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah yeah. The LS-14. The Pre amps are similar to those of the LS-100 right? > It sounded almost the same on the youtube video I heard. But then again, > that's youtube not Neal trying it with all his cool mikes. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Aidan > Maher > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 4:56 PM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: motherboard with good onboard audio > > Yes, that quality is great. I also record that on total recorder and > others. > Also good to mention that if you con't afford the zoom or > ls100 or the sound devices, you might also try the ls14 as it also record > up > to 96-24 bit. I don't mind the overdub and multi track stuff to be equal to > cd quality, as you mostly either burn it on cd afterwords, or just use the > wave file to convert from there and/or use the project in the original > format. > > On 01/05/2013, Hamit Campos <hamitcam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yeah, it is. Plus, you have heard what it sounds like already to a >> cirtain extent. When ever Neal uses his 744-T on pod casts, that's >> what this thing sounds like. It's also what the USB Pre2 audio >> interface sounds like. So he didn't know what format the projects were >> saved in then? That's too bad. I thought he would. Oh well. By the >> way, I think the overdub stuff only works at CD quality. In other >> words, it only works at LPCM 44 thousand 100 KHZ 16 Bit. If I remember >> correctly anyways. I'd mostly be recording in Blu-ray quality on it > though. Yes, PCM 96 KHZ 24 Bit is Blu-Ray HD audio quality. >> So >> there it is. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >> Aidan >> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 6:23 AM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: motherboard with good onboard audio >> >> Well, its not so difficult, as most of the multi track features can be >> figured out when playback and you can also assign the mute and solo to >> the >> f1 and f2 keys. I did ask neil but he couldn't tel me. That other >> recorder sounds great. >> >> On 01 May 2013, at 2:21, "Hamit Campos" <hamitcam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ah yeah. I don't know about that. Perhaps Neal might. But here's the >> other thing though. As far as I know, all the multitrack stuff isn't >> too accessible. I know someone on this here list did it once, but it >> doesn't talk. So, if you can deal with that like Neal can, and like >> that person can, then yeah maybe. I want one for the quality. I don't >> think I'd use the multitrack thing that much though. On something like >> the Sound Devices 788-T I might though. That thing has 8 XLR plugs. So >> you can use 8 mikes. Import those into Pro Tools, and you can create >> 7.1 surround files. Yeah, I'm into >> 7.1 surround sound. I love surround sound. But yeah. The problem with >> all the Sound Devices stuff though is it doesn't talk. I can't deal >> with it like Neal can. I'd get lost. I'd have to have some one set it >> up for me and then just forget about it. But yeah, back to the LS-100. >> I like it well enough, and I do want one, but it's just for the sound >> quality, and full LPCM 96 KHZ >> 24 bit. The sound devices goes the next step up in sample rate though, >> they do 192 thousand KHZ. That's way cool. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >> Aidan Maher >> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 5:59 PM >> To: PC Audio Discussion List >> Subject: Re: motherboard with good onboard audio >> >> Yes, I got the focusrite scarlett 2i4 card, and that also dubbles as a >> midi interface, very good and really outstanding. I am considering the >> ls100 as I get to much latency at the moment and I couldn't solve that >> yet, but I have a problem, I am scaired that once I bounce tracks on >> that recorder that I won't be able to export everything in one file, >> because after you have done 8 tracks you must bounce them in order to >> make new space available and to emty the tracks. And the other thing >> is I am not sure if you would be able to open that project in audacity >> or sonar, I mean I don't no wich format the ls100 save its projects. I >> also don't no if you can overdub on one track a few times. >> >> On 30/04/2013, Hamit Campos <hamitcam...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yeah, external maybe better. Even PCIE like the Sound Blaster ones >>> would do perhaps. Now if like me you want to really go high end, then >>> a pro sound card or in fancy turms an Audio Interface would be best. >>> I so want the Sound Devices USB Pre2. Thing is, it's $600. But if >>> you've heard the few recordings Neal Ewers has made on BCT on his >>> Sound Devices 744-T recorder, then you know it's well worth it. I >>> just don't have the $600 at hand. By the way, even something like an >>> LS-100 or a Zoom H4-N would be good to. Pluss, theres are stand alone >>> recordes too so you aren't always strapped to the PC if you don't want >>> to > be. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of >>> Joe >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 3:39 PM >>> To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org >>> Subject: motherboard with good onboard audio >>> >>> Hi. The subject asks the question. Is it possible to get a computer >>> with good onboard audio? The last PC I built in 2008 has an Intel >>> DG41RQ MOTHERBOARD THAT BOASTS OF HIGH DEFINITION audio but its far >>> from >> that. >>> Even >>> at 100 percent I can't get a good level. I've tried several >>> microphones so I don't think the mic is the problem. Are they're any >>> computers out there either pree built or home built that have good >>> level audio? or is it always better to just get an external sound >>> card and forget about on board audio. >>> Thanks. Joe. >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: >> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org >> > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
