Hi WG, Authors, Speaking as a WG participant...
I find the functionality described in this I-D to be very useful. But, I have one concern that I would like to be addressed before adoption or at least get an agreement on (to be handled post-adoption). I am not in favor of how the PST is being used in the I-D. The PST is used - - between PCEs to indicate inter-domain TE processing - between PCE and the head-end (2 PST for RSVP-TE & SR each, but for inter-domain i.e also allocate and report stitching label) We basically need a mechanism to request allocation and reporting of stitching labels. I strongly suggest using a flag and/or a new TLV, I find the use of PST for this inappropriate. A weird side-effect of the current proposal is that every time we have a new PST defined (PCECC is post-WGLC), we would need another one for inter-domain. Moreover, wouldn't it be better if this I-D is independent of the per-domain path setup type? Section 6.3 allows for mixed technologies and the protocol procedures between cooperating PCEs can be defined such that they are independent of the per-domain path setup type to allow for any current or future path setup types. I see no reason to differentiate between RSVP-TE and SR (section 6.2 is all about forwarding on border nodes, and not about PCEP). I discussed this with the authors earlier, where we basically pushed the can down the road, I hope we can resolve this quickly now :) Thanks! Dhruv (As a WG participant) On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:23 PM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04 > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons > - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are > you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to > the list. > > To accommodate for the holiday season, this adoption poll will end on > 11th Jan 2021 (Monday). > > Thanks! > Dhruv > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
