I support adoption of this draft by the PCE WG (co-author, SP) It provides PCEP extensions to accommodate requirements for connection-oriented transport services
Regards, *Luay* On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:33 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05. > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/ > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dsidor-2Dpce-2Dcircuit-2Dstyle-2Dpcep-2Dextensions_&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=BCzdXcYAdRhaGSTquSb49wkxe3RA58OZhIGOokJitwc4rcaPJzmTHDTOlNpFIdjq&s=Fk5Pj2doKXarzVEaJtB3Y8xm3zbz_OLqcRR0FftrhLE&e=> > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. > > Please respond by Friday 15th Dec 2023. > > Please be more vocal during WG polls! > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
