Hi All, I support the adoption of this draft since it builds on existing PCEP signaling for co-routed bidir paths and introduces extensions specifically for circuit-style paths.
Thanks, Ketan On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:03 PM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05. > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/ > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. > > Please respond by Friday 15th Dec 2023. > > Please be more vocal during WG polls! > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
