Just small update: 01 version is posted now (It is addressing comments received during adoption poll, which I originally posted in in draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-06).
Thanks for all valuable comments and for supporting this draft. Regards Samuel From: Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <ssi...@cisco.com> Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2023 12:05 PM To: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com>; pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org> Cc: draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensi...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: WG Adoption of draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05 Hi PCE-chairs, I submitted version 00 (which is aligned with draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05) – it is waiting for chairs approval. I’ll upload 01 version with handled comments (from version 06) after approving submission of 00 version. (Sorry for delay – I’m on PTO, so my responses may be delayed). Thanks a lot, Samuel From: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com<mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 12:58 PM To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org> Cc: draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensi...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensi...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: WG Adoption of draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05 Hi WG, The adoption call is concluded and we have a new WG I-D. Thanks to those who provided feedback and comments. Authors, Please post a -00 version with no content change. Please handle comments received in -01. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:02 PM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com<mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote: Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-05. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sidor-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 15th Dec 2023. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
--- Begin Message ---Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-01.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: PCEP extensions for Circuit Style Policies Authors: Samuel Sidor Praveen Maheshwari Andrew Stone Luay Jalil Shuping Peng Name: draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-01.txt Pages: 12 Dates: 2024-01-05 Abstract: This document proposes a set of extensions for Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Circuit Style Policies - Segment-Routing Policy designed to satisfy requirements for connection-oriented transport services. New TLV is introduced to control path recomputation and new flag to add ability to request path with strict hops only. The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-01.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-01 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
