cool, I just miss a few bandlimited oscillators in Pd, I'm doing them as patches/abstractions, but I think the best way to go would be to code an external, hopefully it ain't be too tricky and hard, but over my head one way or another :P
2015-11-24 13:22 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry <c...@chnry.net>: > yes, this can be very efficient when the table is pre computed. > using 32 bits int and a 8K sample table, I recently implement a BL saw~ in > an arduino due with surprisingly fast and good result. > > cheers > c > > Le 24/11/2015 16:12, Frank Barknecht a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:01:00PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: >> >>> Do any of you know the advantages and disadvantages between >>> "*oversampling >>> + filtering*" and the other techniques? >>> >> >> A big difference is CPU load: the bandlimited oscillators in the >> rj-library >> aimed at mobile devices of some years ago use the transition splicing >> technique >> because it's one of the fastest. It only needs a simple table lookup in >> addition to the phasor~ etc. that are running anyway. We even replaced >> the >> tabread4~ with tabread~ to save even more CPU. >> >> Ciao >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
