As it so often does, I think it comes down to what you hope to be able to do with them. I wouldn't expect to be able to run 100 instances of my [gbuzz~] abstraction (save me, gbuzz!), and it certainly would be more efficient as part of an external. But handling efficiency/performance tradeoffs is just part of Pd patching, especially with respect to synthesis. What's your use case?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com> wrote: > I didn't think about other solutions in a patch besides *oversampling + > filtering* and I considered it too expensive and not perfect. I assumed > most of the techniques for bandlimiting wouldn't be possible as patches > and/or would be inefficient. > > But you (all) tell me :) > > 2015-11-24 14:20 GMT-02:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at>: > >> On 2015-11-24 16:25, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: >> > but I think the best way to go would be to code an >> > external, >> >> why? >> >> fgamsdr >> IOhannes >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list