Each new instance of [random] already seeds itself differently, so adding $0 isn't going to change anything there. The problem is that the seeds are repeated when you restart PD, so you'll get the same pseudo-random results every time you open the program. $0 won't help here, because the $0 values also repeat when you restart PD. ________________________________ From: Pd-list <pd-list-boun...@lists.iem.at> on behalf of Peter P. <peterpar...@fastmail.com> Sent: 02 July 2018 18:26 To: pd-list@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] Random
* Liam Goodacre <liamg...@hotmail.com> [2018-07-02 06:34]: > Perhaps using $0 might be better then as it is unique and automatically > assigned. > > But $0 itself is deterministic--the first instance is 1003, the second is > 1004, etc. Yes, but it will provide a different seed to [random] inside every abstraction. Forgive me if I understand your intentions in the wrong way- _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
