PDFdev is a service provided by PDFzone.com | http://www.pdfzone.com _____________________________________________________________
At 9:29 PM +0100 7/24/03, Aandi Inston wrote:
Not really. The base 14 fonts are fonts whose attributes are known to the PDF viewer, and which therefore needs no FontDescriptor.
Actually, this is not true anymore with Acrobat 6. It no longer incorporates the metrics for the Base14 anymore. Instead, they use either the few fonts it carries (Courier, Adobe Sans) OR (more common) goes to the OS for substitution fonts (Arial/Helvetica, Times/TimesNewRoman).
The actual names of the "standard" Asian fonts is irrelevant.
I don't believe this is true. The names are important, just as they were with the Base14 previous to Acrobat 6.
are used to substitute, in the same way as the Adobe Sans MM and Adobe Serif MM fonts are used. The task is easier (in one way) because far eastern fonts are largely monospaced.
Were used. They aren't anymore for Acrobat 6.
The task is easier (in one way) because far eastern fonts are largely monospaced.
There are usually two versions of each CJK font - one mono and one proportional...
So, you can non-embed any name you like, WITH suitable FontDescriptors, and the standard Asian fonts are used instead.
I don't believe so - AFAIK, the fact that a font is Asian doesn't cause Acrobat to treat it any differently in terms of load/substitution.
Examine a PDF created by Distiller or PDFWriter from an asian font without embedding, and use that as a model.
Do NOT use PDFWriter as a model - it doesnt do the right thing(s) with Asian fonts...
Leonard -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Leonard Rosenthol <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chief Technical Officer <http://www.pdfsages.com> PDF Sages, Inc. 215-629-3700 (voice) 215-629-0789 (fax)
To change your subscription: http://www.pdfzone.com/discussions/lists-pdfdev.html
