Hi Ed,
> The problem you identified is due to a logic error in the bifuncs in P::Ops – > they weren’t handling complex inputs correctly because the code to do so was > behind a check for unsigned-handling. Now that’s corrected, and there’s a > test to guard against regressions. As soon as the tests have passed on the > CI, there will be a 2.028 on its way to CPAN. I installed it from github and seems to work! Thanks. Will FFTW3 work with the new complex? I believe it only works currently with [2,N] real pdl's and not with actual PDL::Complex pdl's. It would be nice if it could admit the three kinds. According to http://fftw.org/fftw3_doc/Complex-numbers.html it seems possible to use the fftw libraries with C99 complex numbers. Best regards, Luis -- o W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*) Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\ Av. Universidad s/n CP 62210 | (*)/\/ \ Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/ GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16 C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB _______________________________________________ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
