On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 03:28:09PM +0000, Ed . wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I added the warning because I found the behaviour surprising when adding
> tests. My plan now is that ci() will go away, so my proposal is to use it as
> “ci()” for now, bearing in mind it’s only temporary. How does that sound?
Sounds good to me.
The warning is not in 2.028_01, is it?
Best regards,
Luis
--
o
W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\
Av. Universidad s/n CP 62210 | (*)/\/ \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | [email protected] /\_/\__/
GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16 C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB
_______________________________________________
pdl-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
