Sorry to have been unclear: I mean I added the “WARNING” in the documentation. The code does not give any warnings, and I’m not planning to add any, since "ci” will be going away soon.
From: Luis Mochan<mailto:moc...@icf.unam.mx> Sent: 08 March 2021 15:50 To: pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] [Pdl-devel] PDL 2.027 released On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 03:28:09PM +0000, Ed . wrote: > Hi folks, > > I added the warning because I found the behaviour surprising when adding > tests. My plan now is that ci() will go away, so my proposal is to use it as > “ci()” for now, bearing in mind it’s only temporary. How does that sound? Sounds good to me. The warning is not in 2.028_01, is it? Best regards, Luis -- o W. Luis Mochán, | tel:(52)(777)329-1734 /<(*) Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM | fax:(52)(777)317-5388 `>/ /\ Av. Universidad s/n CP 62210 | (*)/\/ \ Cuernavaca, Morelos, México | moc...@fis.unam.mx /\_/\__/ GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16 C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB _______________________________________________ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
_______________________________________________ pdl-general mailing list pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
