I did not receive a comment from this person. I guess that's a good
thing. If I had received something malicious without first knowing that
he blasted almost everyone, I would probably have felt badly about it.
Paul
Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> On 5 Jan 2001, at 19:48, Sid Barras wrote:
>
> > Hi all:
> > Here's a critique I received in my mailbox today regarding my PUG submission:
> >
> > "You have forever fixed yourself into 'amateur" status by telling us how
> > difficult this shot was. With a 35mm and maybe a 135mm lens it's a snap
> > (so to speak)."
>
> Not that I agree with the approach but it seems that the author made
> comments to many of the contributors, not an effortless task, were any
> comments actually positive? Did every contributor to this months PUG (yes I
> will contribute again soon, I still have some issues with the equipment
> restrictions) receive a comment?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rob Studdert
> HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> Fax +61-2-9554-9259
> UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
>
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
>http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
> Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
