On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:20:02 +1000, "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd bet that he only sent coments to those whose email addresses appear with
their photos. Avoiding kooks (and spammers) is one of the reasons I don't put my
email address on the web anywhere.
BTW: This guy's annoyance factor is minor compared to some of the losers out
there. Someone didn't like the anti-spam section of my web page and decided to
take revenge by sending out a load of spam "advertising" my web page for me. The
result was *hundreds* of nasty complaint emails from the recipients and several
days of hassle.
I did eventually make a friend of one of the recipients when he found out what
really happened and together we tracked down the source (someone on Earthlink
who relayed everything through hijacked Taiwanese and Korean servers) and got
his ISP to give him the boot.
There are mailbombers, spammers and many other kinds of sociopaths on the net.
By comparison this photo critic is taking a relatively harmless way of dealing
with his inferiority complex.
Mark
>Not that I agree with the approach but it seems that the author made
>comments to many of the contributors, not an effortless task, were any
>comments actually positive? Did every contributor to this months PUG (yes I
>will contribute again soon, I still have some issues with the equipment
>restrictions) receive a comment?
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
