OK, if it's *that* obvious, pray tell us what it was?
I just think there were enough PUG submissions that he lost
interest before he finished sending comments to everyone. If you
know something, let us in on the secret.
Len
---
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Frank Theriault
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 11:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: I got an UGLY Malicious PUG Comment--
> Did anyone else?
>
>
> My e-mail address was published with my shot, but I
> got no "critique". Obviously there was something
> else involved in his
> selection process.
>
> regards,
> frank
>
> Len Paris wrote:
>
> > > There are mailbombers, spammers and many other kinds
> > > of sociopaths on the net.
> > > By comparison this photo critic is taking a
> > > relatively harmless way of dealing
> > > with his inferiority complex.
> > >
> > > Mark
> >
> > There is always the chance that this particular
> individual has
> > subscribed to the PDML to see the effects of his
> handiwork. If
> > nobody would mention these things the fun for the
> perpetrators
> > would be greatly diminished. If there has been no physical
> > damage done, just ignore it and make no mention of it.
> >
> > I'm sure we all know this but maybe some folks need
> reminding.
> >
> > Len
> > ---
> >
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
> To unsubscribe, visit http://www.pdml.net and follow
> the directions.
> > Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
>
>
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
> unsubscribe, visit http://www.pdml.net and follow the
> directions.
> Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
>
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org
