On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
> > I too think that a back that prints exposure info and is an
> > intervalometer to boot, is very useful.
>
> I don't get this. Why would anyone have this feature in an optional
> and expensive back. Why not implemented into the body like the MZ-S?
Because then the people who don't want it don't have to pay for it?
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Visit the PUG at
http://pug.komkon.org.