[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 1/18/01 8:46:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << > > If the contents on the CDRWs are of great value to you, consider > keeping > > them in appropriately separate locations. > > < >> > > And all my Granny has to do to store her photos is stick them in a light > tight shoe box then slide that sucker under the bed with the rest of her now > ancient (some of me as a 8 year old boy wearing shorts) (circa 1947) photos. Yep, and that's all you have to do with CDs, too. The idea of keeping them in separate locations is so that in the event of, say, a fire, both CDs won't be destroyed. It's not because of some electromagnetic field they emit or anything. Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
- OT: Digital image volatility Rob Studdert
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Todd Stanley
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility John Francis
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Joseph McAllister
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Otis Wright, Jr.
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Rob Studdert
- RE: OT: Digital image volatility Chris Niesmertelny
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Aaron Reynolds
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Aaron Reynolds
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Tom Rittenhouse
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Chris Brogden
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Aaron Reynolds
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Juan J. Buhler
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Bruce Dayton
- Re: OT: Digital image volatil... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility Mark Roberts
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility William Robb
- Re: OT: Digital image volatility SudaMafud