>a camera which does not address the concerns of a fairly large part of
>the market cannot be considered an all-rounder. An all-rounder is a
>camera like the LX which could be used for the full range of 35mm
>activities at the time. From scientific, macro and copy work, through the
>point-and-shoot functionality of the day, to heavy-duty photojournalism.
>
>A camera which can't do all of these things is not an all-rounder.
After checking the spec, I think they were trying to create a high class
MZ/ZX model, rather than a high end model.
regards,
Alan Chan
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
