Roland wrote: > We must consider now that the MZ-S body and shutter mechanism are far more > expensive to manufacture than the body and shutter in the Z-1p, simply because > that they are of higher quality. I was told today that the MZ-S was built to more exacting standards - low tolerances. (it wasn't said more exacting compared to what - apparently everything else). Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Pål Jensen
- RE: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Alan Chan
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Alan Chan
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Alan Chan
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Alan Chan
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Mike Johnston
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff SudaMafud
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Rob Studdert
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff aimcompute
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff PAUL STENQUIST
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Pål Jensen
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Rfsindg
- Pentax MZ-S makes sense Jens Bladt
- Re: Pentax MZ-S makes sense Otis Wright, Jr.
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff SudaMafud
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff dave o'brien
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Pål Jensen
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff SudaMafud
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff Alan Chan
- Re: News from PMA - MZ-S and other stuff dave o'brien