Hi, Tom, I think we only went through this debate 2 or 3 times since you've left. As you undoubtedly recall, it comes up on a regular basis, in it's various incarnations. I love your definition, though, as it applies particularly to me <g>
Of course, this thread is (at least from my perspective), tongue in cheek - I think I'm just punch-drunk after the flame-war on G**s. cheers, frank T Rittenhouse wrote: > As I recall, we went though this what is a professional camera thing about a > year ago, and hashed it out pretty thorouhly. Then I asked how we define an > amatuer camera. No one was interested. So I will give the definative answer > to both questions: > > Pro camera -- one you can not afford. > Am camera -- one you have. > -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
