GreyWolf is BACK, dammit. lol -Lon
T Rittenhouse wrote: > > As I recall, we went though this what is a professional camera thing about a > year ago, and hashed it out pretty thorouhly. Then I asked how we define an > amatuer camera. No one was interested. So I will give the definative answer > to both questions: > > Pro camera -- one you can not afford. > Am camera -- one you have. > > Ciao, > Graywolf > http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:39 PM > Subject: Re: PROS-was:ABORTION-was: Way OT: GUNS, GUNS, AND MORE GUNS. > > > Ah, but what if the pro is taking family snapshots on his day off? Is he > still a > > pro? And would the camera he uses be a pro camera? What if he uses the > same > > camera to take those snapshots as he does whilst working? Would it only > be a pro > > camera while "on the job", but an amateur camera on Sunday at the zoo? > > > > OTOH, what if he takes family snapshots, but years later, sells one of > those > > shots? Would the camera be an amateur camera, but ~suddenly~ turn into a > pro > > camera? > > > > What if he ~was~ an amateur when he took the snapshot, but years later, > turned > > into a pro, then sold the photo? What's the body then? > > > > That should be enough to chew on for now... > > > > <vbg> > > > > -frank (in a devilish mood tonight) > > > > Peter Alling wrote: > > > > > That's easy, professional cameras are the ones professionals use, > amateurs > > > use amateur > > > cameras. > > > > > > At 05:24 PM 12/10/2002 -0600, you wrote: > > > >I've got one! I'm still not too clear on the difference between > professional > > > >and amateur cameras ... (running and ducking) > > > > > > > > -- > > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The > pessimist fears > > it is true." -J. Robert > > Oppenheimer > > > >
