[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Customer saves a whopping $.27. > That is with 50% film usage, and a 50% failure rate: > keepers/taken vs 100% success with digital. > > Am I starting to sound like Mafud on the subject?
No, not like Mafud, but don't push it! <g> The example is interesting. I'm fooling with digital now. I like the immediate results, But don't want to spend any more time in front of the computer!!! And it's costing me more as I print 8 1/2 by 11 inch color prints... (I've taken 1,000 pictures with it in the last 12 months, FYI) (At 3 megapixels, the results are not photo quality but fun 8x10's) Regards, Bob S.
