Are you using tap or bottle water.Any change in development times noticed as mentioned by others??
Dave(who now has all the chemicals and jugs)Brooks ---- Begin Original Message ---- From: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:42:57 -0500 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post I only recntly discovered presoak, now for some reason my neg are cleaner. --- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > Subject: OT: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post > > > > Seeing as how I belong to both PDML and the HUG, I > was wondering if anyone > > had comments on this. > > > > I personally try to pre-soak everything but > apparently (at least from the > > HUG) it looks as though pre-soaking is not done by > some.. and vehemently > > opposed by others. > > > > What does everyone else think? > > I've found that with presoaking, I get more even > development, and no > decrease in film speed, although as with any change > in processing technique, > testing needs to be done to get a new development > time. > > William Robb > > ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca ---- End Original Message ---- Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada "Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art stops and the wall begins"--Frank Zappa http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
